Impact Study // GoodLeap Recruiting

GoodLeap Recruiting + Tenre

AI Employee Recruiting Platform

Two professionals shaking hands across a table after a job interview

Recruiters got their week back to do the work that actually closes — interviewing.

A recruiting team buried in top-of-funnel

Sourcing is the worst part of a recruiter's day. We replaced it.

GoodLeap's recruiting team was strong on closing. What they couldn't do at the volume their hiring plans required was source. The top-of-funnel work — finding candidates, sending first outreach, scheduling, handling logistics — was eating the week before any actual recruiting could start.

They didn't need more recruiters. They needed the funnel to fill itself.

“The schedule was full and we hadn't done anything yet.”

GoodLeap recruiter

/0.1

The dual-agent architecture, repurposed

We took the same two-agent architecture from our internal sales outreach platform and pointed it at talent acquisition. The first agent sources qualified candidates against role criteria. The second runs outreach, handles the conversation, and books interviews directly on the recruiter's calendar.

Recruiters describe roles in plain English the same way our sales team describes ICPs. The agents do the sourcing and the outreach work that used to swallow their week.

Placeholder — drop in a screenshot of the recruiter dashboard.

/0.2

What changed for the recruiters

Recruiters stopped doing top-of-funnel work and started spending their time where the team actually adds value — interviewing, judgment calls, candidate experience. The pipeline filled itself in the background.

The first week was the strangest one. Calendars filled, candidates moved through stages, and the recruiters hadn't done the work that had previously taken up their days.

For a high-volume recruiting team, the AI didn't replace recruiters. It deleted the work no recruiter wants in the first place.